What to do about the entity limit?
Reset the entity render distance
100.00%
1
Raise the limit in the rules
0%
0
Some other solution
0%
0
1 vote(s)
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why the 200-entity limit is too restrictive
#1
As someone who seriously struggles to keep his entity count down, especially after the entity distance was raised, the 200-entity limit is a fantasy at best and untenable at worst. For those of you who don't know, I like to keep animal pens around me, as well as some villagers for trade. Not so bad, right? The problem is that I live on an island surrounded by fish and squid and the occasional. Those mobs alone can take up a third of my entity count, and that's when I keep it below 200. Add in 17 sheep, 1 wolf of each collar, 9 stacks of eggs' worth of chickens and some extra, a scute farm, 2 horses, mooshroom and pig pens, a rabbit hutch with 2 of each type obtainable in survival, etc., etc., and we're seeing around 300 entities. And that's before you factor in the villager market I had before committing genocide.

There are two solutions I can see:
1. Lower the entity render distance back to what it was at the start of the map, making it so you basically have to cheese Bullseye and Sniper Duel,
or 2. Raise the entity limit specified in the rules.

Seriously, this is a struggle for me and, I'm sure, many other players here who have a half-decent base established. Something needs to change, and either way, people will be upset.
[Image: SupersuMC.png]
Thinking is dangerous, but so is everything else when you put your mind to it.
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why the 200-entity limit is too restrictive - by SupersuMC - 05-24-2023, 09:15 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Powered by MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group - Theme designed by Rōshi © 2015-2024.
This site is not affiliated by Mojang AB, makers of Minecraft. Brands, trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective holders.